Preview

The EYE GLAZ

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Efficacy of high add soft bifocal contact lenses in myopia control at a five-year follow-up

https://doi.org/10.33791/2222-4408-2024-4-229-238

Abstract

Introduction. Myopia is a widespread and growing public health concern. The impact of soft contact lenses (MCLs), which create a relative myopic peripheral defocus with an add power of +1.5 to +2.00 D, on slowing myopia progression has been widely studied in short- and long-term studies. However, studies lasting more than three years that evaluate the effect of high add multifocal soft contact lenses (MFCLs) on ocular growth and refractive error dynamics are limited. Purpose: to evaluate the effect of bifocal soft contact lenses (BFCLs) Prima BIO Bi-focal with an add power of +4.00 D on the dynamics of refractive error and axial eye length in patients with progressive myopia over a prolonged period of wear. Materials and methods. Twenty-eight patients (28 eyes) with bilateral myopia, with a spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error between –0.75 and –5.5 D, astigmatism <1.25 D, and anisometropia up to 1.00 D, were included in this study conducted from 2018 to 2023. The mean age of the participants was 10 years. Based on the degree of myopia, the patients were divided into two groups: the first group consisted of 13 patients with mild myopia (–0.75 to –3.00 D), while the second group consisted of 15 patients with moderate myopia (–3.25 to –5.50 D). Cycloplegic refraction, visual acuity, and axial eye length were evaluated at the initial examination and follow-up visits at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. Patients in both groups wore BFCLs Prima BIO Bi-focal with an add power of +4.00 D on a monthly regimen for at least 10 hours per day. Results. After 60 months of wearing high add BFCLs, the change in refractive error from baseline was 0.25 (0; 0.75) D in the first group and 1.25 (0.5; 1.5) D in the second group. The increase in axial eye length after 60 months compared to baseline was 0.14 (0.03; 0.24) mm in the group with mild myopia, and 0.48 (0.21; 0.55) mm in the group with moderate myopia. Conclusion. The data indicate a stabilizing effect of high add BFCLs on the progression of both mild and moderate myopia. A greater antimyopic effect, in terms of refractive error dynamics and axial elongation, was observed in the group with mild myopia. Further research is needed to explore the correlation between the antimyopic effect of BFCLs and the degree of myopia.

Subscription or article purchase required to access item. To verify subscription, access previous purchase, or purchase article, log in to journal.

About the Authors

A. V. Myagkov
National Myopia Institute
Russian Federation

Alexander V. Myagkov, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Director

7, Deguninskaya Str., Moscow, 125438



E. S. Zenkova
National Myopia Institute
Russian Federation

Elena S. Zenkova, Ophthalmologist, Researcher, Department of Orthokeratology and Myopia Control

7, Deguninskaya Str., Moscow, 125438



References

1. Jung S-K, Lee JH, Kakizaki H, Jee D. Prevalence of myopia and its association with body stature and educational evel in 19-year-old male conscripts in Seoul, South Korea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(9):5579–5583. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10106

2. Sun J, Zhou J, Zhao P, et al. High prevalence of myopia and high myopia in 5060 Chinese university students in Shanghai. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2012;53(12):7504–7509. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8343

3. Holden B, Sankaridurg P, Smith E, et al. Myopia, an underrated global challenge to vision: where the current data takes us on myopia control. Eye. 2014;28(2):142–146. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.256

4. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006

5. Dong L, Kang YK, Li Y, et al. Prevalence and time trends of myopia in children and adolescents in China: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Retina. 2020;40(3):399–411. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002590

6. Grzybowski A, Kanclerz P, Tsubota K, et al. A review on the epidemiology of myopia in school children worldwide. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1220-0

7. Tarutta EP, Iomdina EN, Tarasova NA, et al. Complex approach to the prevention and treatment of progressive myopia in schoolchildren. RMJ “Clinical ophthalmology”. 2018;2:70–76. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21689/2311-7729-2018-18-2-70-76

8. Proskurina OV, Markova EYu, Brzheskiy VV, et al. The prevalence of myopia in schoolchildren in some regions of Russia. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2018;15(3):348–353. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2018-3-348-353

9. Obrubov SA, Tumasian AP. On the treatment of progressive myopia in children. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2005;4:30–32. (In Russ.)

10. Iwase A, Araie M, Tomidokoro A, et al. Prevalence and causes of low vision and blindness in a Japanese adult population: the Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(8):1354–1362. doi: 10.101 6/j.ophtha.2006.04.022

11. Myagkov AV, Zenkova ES. Pathogenesis of progressive myopia (literature review). The EYE GLAZ. 2023;25(4):312–320. (In Russ.) doi: 10.33791/2222-4408-2023-4-312-320

12. Smith EL. III. Prentice award lecture 2010: A case for peri¬pheral optical treatment strategies for myopia. Optometry and Vision Science. 2011;88(9):1029–1044. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182279cfa

13. Myagkov AV, Myagkov DA. Optical methods for the management of progressive myopia. The EYE GLAZ. 2023;25(2):151–162. (In Russ.) doi: 10.33791/2222-4408-2023-2-151-162

14. Aller TA, Liu M, Wildsoet CF. Myopia control with bifocal contact lenses: A randomized clinical trial. Optometry and vision science. 2016;93:344–352.

15. Li SM, Kang MT, Wu SS, et al. Studies using concentric ring bifocal and peripheral add multifocal contact lenses to slow myopia progression in school-aged children: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37(1):51–59. doi: 10.1111/opo.12332

16. Chamberlain P, Peixoto-de-Matos SC, Logan NS, et al. A 3-year randomized clinical trial of MiSight lenses for myopia control. Optom Vis Sci. 2019;96(8):556–567. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001410

17. Yu Z, Zhong A, Zhao X, et al. Efficacy and safety of different add power soft contact lenses on myopia progression in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmic Res. 2022;65(4):398–416. doi: 10.1159/000523675

18. Fujikado T, Ninomiya S, Kobayashi T, et al. Effect of low-addition soft contact lenses with decentered optical design on myopia progression in children: a pilot study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:1947–1956. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S66884

19. Avetisov SE, Myagkov AV, Egorova AV, et al. Results of a two-year clinical study of myopia control with bifocal defocus-inducing soft contact lenses. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2021;137(3):5–12. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/oftalma20211370315

20. Tideman JWL, Polling JR, Vingerling JR, et al. Axial length growth and the risk of developing myopia in European children. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96(3):301–309. doi: 10.1111/aos.13603

21. Klaver C, Polling JR; Erasmus Myopia Research Group. Myopia management in the Netherlands. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020;40(2):230–240. doi: 10.1111/opo.12676

22. Koller M. Robustlmm: An R package for robust estimation of linear mixed-effects models. Journal of Statistical Software. 2016;75(6);1–24. doi: 10.18637/jss.v075.i06

23. Mutti DO, Hayes JR, Mitchell GL, et al; CLEERE Study Group. Refractive error, axial length, and relative peripheral refractive error before and after the onset of myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(6):2510–2519. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0562

24. Sankaridurg P, Holden B, Smith E 3rd, et al. Decrease in rate of myopia progression with a contact lens designed to reduce relative peripheral hyperopia: one-year results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(13):9362–9367. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7260

25. Chamberlain P, Peixoto-de-Matos SC, Logan NS, et al. A 3-year randomized clinical trial of MiSight lenses for slowing myopia progression. The EYE GLAZ. 2020;22(4(132)):11–28. (In Russ.) doi: 10.33791/2222-4408-2020-4-11-28

26. Ruiz-Pomeda A, Pérez-Sánchez B, Valls I, et al. MiSight Assessment Study Spain (MASS). A 2-year randomized clinical trial. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256(5):1011–1021. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-3906-z

27. Anstice NS, Phillips JR. Effect of dual-focus soft contact lens wear on axial myopia progression in children. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(6):1152–1161. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.10.035

28. Lam CS, Tang WC, Tse DY, et al. Defocus Incorporated Soft Contact (DISC) lens slows myopia progression in Hong Kong Chinese schoolchildren: a 2-year randomised clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(1):40–45. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303914

29. Walline JJ, Greiner KL, McVey ME, Jones-Jordan LA. Multifocal contact lens myopia control. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90(11):1207–1214. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000036

30. Pauné J, Morales H, Armengol J, et al. Myopia control with a novel peripheral gradient soft lens and orthokeratology: A 2-year clinical trial. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:507572. doi: 10.1155/2015/507572.

31. Walline JJ, Walker MK, Mutti DO, et al; BLINK Study Group. Effect of high add power, medium add power, or single-vision contact lenses on myopia progression in children: The BLINK randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;324(6):571–580. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.10834

32. Huang J, Wen D, Wang Q, et al. Efficacy comparison of 16 interventions for myopia control in children: A network meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(4):697–708. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.11.010

33. Brennan N, Toubouti Y, Cheng X, Bullimore M. Efficacy in myopia control. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 2021;83:100923. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100923

34. Braun CI, Freidlin V, Sperduto RD, et al. The progression of myopia in school age children: data from the Columbia Medical Plan. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1996;3(1):13–21. doi: 10.3109/09286589609071597

35. Saw SM, Nieto FJ, Katz J, et al. Factors related to the progression of myopia in Singaporean children. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77(10):549–554. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200010000-00009

36. Saw SM, Chua WH, Gazzard G, et al. Eye growth chan¬ges in myopic children in Singapore. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89(11):1489–1494. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.071118

37. Hyman L, Gwiazda J, Hussein M, et al. Relationship of age, sex, and ethnicity with myopia progression and axial elongation in the correction of myopia evaluation trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(7):977–987. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.7.977

38. Chua SY, Sabanayagam C, Cheung YB, et al. Age of onset of myopia predicts risk of high myopia in later childhood in myopic Singapore children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2016;36(4):388–394. doi: 10.1111/opo.12305

39. Tricard D, Marillet S, Ingrand P, et al. Progression of myopia in children and teenagers: a nationwide longitudinal study. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2022;106:1104–1110. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318256


Review

For citations:


Myagkov A.V., Zenkova E.S. Efficacy of high add soft bifocal contact lenses in myopia control at a five-year follow-up. The EYE GLAZ. 2024;26(4):229-238. https://doi.org/10.33791/2222-4408-2024-4-229-238

Views: 776


ISSN 2222-4408 (Print)
ISSN 2686-8083 (Online)