

Eyeglass correction: influence on the morphometric parameters of the anterior chamber and the eye hydrodynamics in presbyopes with hyperopia
https://doi.org/10.33791/2222-4408-2023-1-11-18
Abstract
The work of accommodative apparatus has a regulatory effect on the hydrodynamics of eye and it is involved in ensuring the normal outflow of intraocular fluid (IOF). Age-related weakening of accommodation leads to a deterioration in the state of hydrodynamics, and especially significant shifts are expected in patients with axial hyperopia in the anatomical boundaries of “short” eye.
Purpose. To evaluate the effect of correction with progressive lenses and monofocal ones on hydrodynamic indicators and certain morphometric parameters of the anterior chamber in presbyopic patients with hyperopia under conditions of long-term habitual professional eye strain.
Material and methods. 25 subjects (50 eyes) of 44–55 y. o. (mean age 47 ± 1,6 years) were examined in January-July 2022. There were 8 males and 17 females with presbyopia and hyperopia. All patients were examined at the end of their working day: the first examination was performed in the initial state without correction, the second one − under using correction with monofocal lenses (control group) or progressive ones (main group). The examination methods included visometry, autorefractometry, pneumotonometry, ultrasound biometry, computerized tonography, determination of accommodation amplitude using the push-up test, optical coherence tomography of the eye anterior segment.
Results. The critic tension of hydrodynamics, the decreasing of anterior chamber depth and iridocorneal angle width were revealed in presbyopic hyperopic patients under the conditions of eye strain at a near distance without correction with eyeglasses. Using of correction with progressive lenses led to significant increasing of the accommodation amplitude (p < 0,001), decreasing of IOP (p < 0,001), increasing of aqueous humor outflow (p < 0,001), deepening of the anterior chamber (p < 0,001) and increasing of the iridocorneal angle width (p < 0,001) compared to the initial state. No significant changes in these parameters were revealed in the users of monofocal lenses compared to the initial state.
Conclusion. Using of progressive lenses as a permanent correction has a positive effect on ocular hydrodynamics and morphometric parameters of the anterior chamber in presbyopic hyperopes. Lack of correction in hyperopic patients of presbyopic age not only causes of eye fatigue but also can lead to disruption of hydrodynamic balance and development of glaucoma.
About the Authors
I. A. GndoyanRussian Federation
Irina A. Gndoyan, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Ophthalmology
1, Pavshih Bortsov Sq., Volgograd, 400161, Russian Federation
A. V. Petraevsky
Russian Federation
Alexei V. Petraevsky, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Professor of the Department of Ophthalmology
1, Pavshih Bortsov Sq., Volgograd, 400161, Russian Federation
N. A. Kuznetsova
Russian Federation
Natalia A. Kuznetsova, Postgraduate Student at the Department of Ophthalmology; Ophthalmologist, Deputy Director for Medical Treatment
1, Pavshih Bortsov Sq., Volgograd, 400161, Russian Federation
4, Rionskaya Str., Volgograd, 4000107, Russian Federation
References
1. Nesterov A.P., Bunin A.Ya., Katsnelson L.A. Intraocular pressure. Physiology and pathology. Moscow: Nauka, 1974. 381 p. (In Russ.)
2. Nesterov A.P., Khadikova E.V. The effect of electrical stimulation of the ciliary muscle on the hemodynamic parameters of the eye and visual functions in patients with glaucoma. Bulletin of Ophthalmology. 1997;113(4):12–14. (In Russ.)
3. Svetlova O.V., Koshits I.N. Interaction of the main ways of outflow of intraocular fluid with the mechanism of accommodation: textbook. St. Petersburg: MAPO, 2002. 30 p. (In Russ.)
4. Blake J., Horgan T., Carroll P. et al. Effect of accommodation of the lens on ocular pressure. I.J.M.S. 1995;164:269–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02967200
5. Jenssen F., Krohn J. Effects of static accommodation versus repeated accommodation on intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma. 2012 Jan;21(1):45–48. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e31820277a9
6. Read S.A., Collins M.J., Becker H. et al. Changes in intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude with accommodation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;94(3):332–335. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.166355
7. Stokkermans T.J., Reitinger J.C., Tye G. et al. Accommodative Exercises to Lower Intraocular Pressure. J Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;18;2020:6613066. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6613066
8. Rozanova O.I. Biomechanics of the accommodative response in health and presbyopia. Ophthalmosurgery. 2014;3:80–85. (In Russ.)
9. Ovechkin I.G., Antonyuk V.D., Antonyuk S.V., Shalygina E.L. Investigation of accommodative ability in presbyopic age patients without of eye pathology. Cataract and refractive surgery. 2013;13:47–49. (In Russ.)
10. Rozanova O.I. Regularities of involutional changes of visual system. Bulletin of the Orenburg State University. 2013;4(153):212–216.
11. Strakhov V.V., Gulidova E.G., Mineeva L.A. Accommodative regulation of ophthalmotonus. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2010;4:37–41.
12. Accommodation: A Guide for Physicians. L.A. Katargina, ed. Moscow, 2012. 136 p. (In Russ.)
13. Shchuko A.G., Novozhilova E.T., Rozanova O.I., Sholokhov L.F. Assessment of ciliary muscle changes in patients with hypermetropia using mathematical modeling methods. Ophthalmology. 2019;4(4):113–118. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2019-4.4.17
14. Rinskaja N.V. Handbook of an optometrist. Algorithm for selecting refraction: a textbook for ophthalmologists and optometrists. Moscow: FARB-IT, 2018. 488 p. (In Russ.)
15. Kiseleva T.N., Gundorova R.A., Romanova L.I., Andreev A.A. The possibilities of ultrasound methods in intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation. Cataract and refractive surgery. 2012;12(2):9–12. (In Russ.)
16. Strakhov V.V., Klimova O.N., Korchagin N.V. Clinic of active accommodation in the distance. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2018;11(1):42–51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2018-11-1-42-51
17. Dronov M.M., Korovenkov R.I. Eye pressure in normal and pathological conditions: Book 1. Anatomical and physiological characteristics. St. Petersburg: Nestor-History, 2011. 204 p. (In Russ.)
18. Koshits I.N., Svetlova O.V. The essence of the physiological intraocular pressure. Part 2. The role of scleral fluctuations in maintaining the continuity of the aqueous humor daily volume. National Journal of Glaucoma. 2019;18(2):76–92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2019.02.09
19. Egorov E.A., Astakhov Yu.S., Botabekova T.K. et al. The International Guide to Glaucoma. 2016; Vol. 2. 184 p. (In Russ.)
20. Gusev Yu.A., Makkaeva S.M., Maslova E.V., Tretyak E.B. Hydrodynamics of the eye and anatomical and topographic features of the anterior segment of the eye before and after phacoemulsification of complicated cataract. Ophthalmology. 2014;11(1):12–20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2014-1-12-20
Review
For citations:
Gndoyan I.A., Petraevsky A.V., Kuznetsova N.A. Eyeglass correction: influence on the morphometric parameters of the anterior chamber and the eye hydrodynamics in presbyopes with hyperopia. The EYE GLAZ. 2023;25(1):11-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33791/2222-4408-2023-1-11-18