Epidemiology of Myopia in Children of the Russian Federation and Analysis of Its Control Methods

The increasing prevalence of myopia is observed all over the world, and Russia is no exception. In this regard, obtaining new data on its epidemiology among children and assessing methods of its control in real clinical practice are highly topical matters.

Purpose. The purpose of this work was to assess the current issues of the epidemiology and treatment of progressive myopia in children in various regions of the Russian Federation.

Materials and methods. We conducted a prospective multicenter epidemiological observational questionnaire study. This study involved 106 doctors from 53 regions of Russia and 2931 parents of myopic children.

Results. 50% of the surveyed doctors noted that the manifestation of myopia is diagnosed in children aged 10–12 years, while 43% noted the same in children aged 7–9 years. According to 74.5% of doctors, the degree of the newly diagnosed myopia ranges from –1.25 to –3.00 diopters, 25.5% of doctors reported that it is below –1.0 diopters. The majority of doctors (73.6%) assess accommodation in myopic children, considering it one of the progression factors. 52.9% of ophthalmologists prescribe optical correction in cases when monocular distance visual acuity amounts to 0.6 (decimal scale) or lower values, while 29.2%, 16% and 1.9% of the surveyed ophthalmologists prescribe optical correction in cases when monocular distance visual acuity amounts to 0.7, 0.8 and 0.9 respectively.

The following optical methods for juvenile myopia control are recommended by the doctors: orthokeratology contact lenses (53.8%), spectacles for full correction (51.9%), peripheral defocus-inducing (bifocal) soft contact lenses (18.9%), while 4.7% of the surveyed doctors utilized other methods of myopia control, which were not indicated in the questionnaire.

Conclusion. In most cases, manifestation of myopia is diagnosed in children aged 7–12 years. Its degree ranges from –1.25 to –3.0 diopters, which indicates its late diagnosis; optical correction is prescribed mainly in cases when monocular distance visual acuity is 0.6 or lower; most ophthalmologists assess accommodation in myopic children, considering it a progression factor. As methods of myopia control, doctors utilize optical correction, device-assisted therapy and pharmacological treatment of accommodative disorders, while parents prefer methods that require minimum time expenditures.

1. Williams K.M., Bertelsen G., Cumberland P., Wolfram C., Verhoeven V.J., Anastasopoulos E. Increasing prevalence of myopia in Europe and the impact of education. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(7):1489–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.018

2. Holden B.A., Fricke T.R., Wilson D.A. Jong M., Naidoo K.S., Sankaridurg P., Wong T.Y., Naduvilath T.J., Resnikoff S. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1036–1042. https://doi.org/ 10.1016 / j.ophtha.2016.01.006

3. Tarutta E.P., Iomdina E.N., Tarasova N.A., Markosyan G.A., Maksimova M.V. Complex approach to the prevention and treatment of progressive myopia in school children. R.M.J. “Clinical Ophthalmology” .2018;2:70–76.

4. Clinical guidelines “Myopia (children)” (Electronic resource). URL: http://cr.rosminzdrav.ru/recomend/109_1

5. Proskurina O.V., Markova E.Yu., Brzhesky V.V., Efimova E.L., Efimova M.N., Khvatova N.V., Egorova, A.V. The prevalence of myopia in schoolchildren in some regions of russia. Ophthalmology. 2018;15(3):348–353.

6. Kempen J.H., Mitchell P., Lee K.E. The prevalence of refractive errors among adults in the United States, Western Europe, and Australia. Arch Ophthalmol.2004;122:495–505. https://doi.org/ 10.1001/archopht.122.4.495

7. Markova E.Yu., Pron’ko N.A., Bezmelnitsyna L.Yu., Aminulla L.V., Venediktova L.V. To the question of school myopia. ophthalmology. 2018;15(1):87–91.

8. Zhao J., Mao J., Luo R., Li F., Munoz S.R., Ellwein L.B. The progression of refractive error in school-age children: Shunyi district, China. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2002;134(5):735–43.

9. Xiang F., He M., Zeng Y., Mai J., Rose K.A., Morgan I.G. Increases in the prevalence of reduced visual acuity and myopia in Chinese children in Guangzhou over the past 20 years. Eye. 2013;27(12):1353–1358.

10. Wang S.K., Guo Y., Liao C. et al. Incidence of and factors associated with myopia and high myopia in Chinese children, based on refraction without cycloplegia. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136(9):1017–1024.

11. Saw S.M., Tong L., Chua W.H. Incidence and progression of myopia in Singaporean school children. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46(1):51–57.

12. Matsumura H., Hirai H. Prevalence of myopia and refractive changes in students from 3 to 17 years of age. Surv. Ophthalmol. 1999;44:109–115.

13. Tsai D.C., Fang S.Y., Huang N. et al. Myopia development among young school children: the myopia investigation study in Taipei. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57(15):6852–6860.

14. Xiang F., He M., Morgan I.G. Annual changes in refractive errors and ocular components before and after the onset of myopia in Chinese children. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(7):1478–1484.

15. Jones L.A., Sinnott L.T., Mutti D.O., Mitchell G.L., Moeschberger M.L., Zadnik K. Parental history of myopia, sports and outdoor activities, and future myopia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48(8):3524–3532.

16. Huang H.M., Chang D.S., Wu P.C. The association between near work activities and myopia in children-a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140419.

17. Williams C., Miller L.L., Gazzard G., Saw S.M. A comparison of measures of reading and intelligence as risk factors for the development of myopia in a UK cohort of children. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2008;92(8):1117–1121.

18. Gwiazda J., Hyman L., Hussein M., Everett D., Norton T.T., Kurtz D., Scheiman M. A randomized clinical trial of progressive addition lenses versus single vision lenses on the progression of myopia in children. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2003; 44(4):1492–1500.

19. Chen Y., Drobe B., Zhang C., Singh N., Spiegel D.P., Chen H., Lu F. Accommodation is unrelated to myopia progression in chinese myopic children. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):1–8.

20. Price H., Allen P.M., Radhakrishnan H., Calver R., Rae S., Theagarayan B., O’Leary D.J. The cambridge anti-myopia study: variables associated with myopia progression. Optometry and Vision Science. 2013; 90(11): 1274–1283.

21. Kalakeya L.C., Esenwah E.C., Ikoro N.C., Megwas A.U., Azuamah E.C., Azuamah Y.C. Accommodation lag among corrected myopes and emmetropes: a comparative study. International Journal of Scientific Research. 2018;9(12E):30166–30168.

22. Richdale K., Bailey M.D., Sinnott L.T., Kao C.Y., Zadnik K., Bullimore M.A. The effect of phenylephrine on the ciliary muscle and accommodation. Optometry and vision science: official publication of the American Academy of Optometry. 2012;89(10):1507.

23. Gimpel G., Doughty M.J., Lyle W.M. Large sample study of the effects of phenylephrine 2.5% eyedrops on the amplitude of accommodation in man. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 1994;14(2):123–128.

24. Brzheskii V.V., Vorontsova T.N., Efimova E.L., Prusinskaya S.M.. Effect of 10% Irifrin in the treatment of children with chronic overtension of accommodation. Clinical ophthalmology. 2008;9(3):90–93.

25. Volkova E.M., Strahov V.V. Irifrin usage as stimulator of distant refraction. Clinical ophthalmology. 2005;6(2):86–90.

26. Strakhov V.V., Gulidova E.G., Volkova E.M. Accommodative and hypotensive effect of sympathomimetic Irifrin. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2013;6(2):76–81.

27. Accommodation: a guide for doctors / Ed. L.A. Katargina. M.: April. 2012:24.

28. Nabil Z., Vorontsova T.N., Brzheskiy V.V. Combined therapy of accommodation spasm in children. Ophthalmic statements. 2011;4(1):23-27