LASIK – the second generation of laser vision correction
https://doi.org/10.33791/2222-4408-2020-3-35-40
Abstract
About the Author
T. Yu. ShilovaRussian Federation
Tatiana Yu. Shilova, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Chief Medical Officer and Leading Ophthalmic Surgeon
Expert of Russian Federation State Duma Committee on Health Protection
References
1. Barraquer J. Estudios e informaciones oftalmológicas. 1949;2(10).
2. Moshirfar M., Bennett P., Ronquillo Y. Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020.
3. Pureskin N. Weakening ocular refraction by partial stromektomy of the cornea in the experiment. Bulletin of Ophthalmology. 1967;8:1–7. (In Russ.)
4. Pallikaris I., Papatzanaki M., Stathi E.Z., Frenschock O., Georgiadis A. Laser in situ keratomileuses. Laser Surg. Med. 1990;10:463–468.
5. Ambrósio R. Jr, Wilson S. LASIK vs LASEK vs PRK: advantages and indications. Semin. Ophthalmol. 2003;18(1):2–10. https://doi.org/10.1076/soph.18.1.2.14074
6. Soong H.K., et al. Femtosecond lasers in ophthalmology. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2009;147:189–197.
7. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/lasik/fda-approved-lasers-prk-and-other-refractive-surgeries (accessed: 13.06.2020).
8. Bower K.S., Woreta F. Update on contraindications for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;25(4):251–257.
9. Touboul D., Salin F., Mortemousque B., et al. Avantages et inconvénients du microkératome laser femtoseconde [Advantages and disadvantages of the femtosecond laser microkeratome]. J. Fr. Ophtalmol. 2005;28(5):535–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0181-5512(05)81094-0
10. Vetter J.M., Schirra A., Garcia-Bardon D., Lorenz K., Weingärtner W.E., Sekundo W. Comparison of intraocular pressure during corneal flap preparation between a femtosecond laser and a mechanical microkeratome in porcine eyes. Cornea. 2011;30(10):1150–1154. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e318212110a
11. Faghihi H., Jalali K.H., Amini A., Hashemi H., Fotouhi A., Esfahani M.R. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment after LASIK for myopia. J. Refract. Surg. 2006;22(5):448–452.
12. Mrochen M., Eldine M.S., Kaemmerer M., Seiler T., Hütz W. Improvement in photorefractive corneal laser surgery results using an active eye-tracking system. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2001;27(7):1000–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00884-1
13. Huang D., Stulting R.D., Carr J.D., Thompson K.P., Waring III G.O. Multiple regression and vector analysis of Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism. J. Refract. Surg. 1999;15:538–549.
14. Azar D.T., Koch D.D. LASIK: Fundamentals, surgical techniques, and complications. New York, Basel: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 2003.
15. Toda I. Dry eye after LASIK. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59(14):DES109–DES115. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-23538
16. Azar D.T., Koch D.D. LASIK: fundamentals, surgical techniques, and complications. Refractive surgery, 1. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 2003.
17. Linke S.J., Richard G., Katz T. Infektiöse Keratitis nach LASIK – aktueller Stand und Literaturübersicht [Infectious keratitis after LASIK – update and survey of the literature]. Klin. Monbl. Augenheilkd. 2011;228(6):531–536. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1245549
18. Randleman J.B., Russell B., Ward M.A., et al. Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:267–275.
19. Pallikaris I.G., Kymionis G.D., Astyrakakis N.I. Corneal ectasia induced by laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2001;27:1796–1802.
Review
For citations:
Shilova T.Yu. LASIK – the second generation of laser vision correction. The EYE GLAZ. 2020;22(3(131)):35-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33791/2222-4408-2020-3-35-40