What makes us meet the needs of a patient with ametropia cautiously?
https://doi.org/10.33791/2222-4408-2019-1-14-24
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the presence of risk factors for ocular hypertension among students inVoronezh and its connection with various types of ametropia.
Material and methods. The present study involved 835 students (454 women, 381 men, 1670 eyes) aged 18 to 27, the average age was 21.2±1.3. Among these students, 442 students (52.9%) had emmetropia, 116 students (13.9%) – hyperopia and 277 students (33.2%) – myopia. The presence of risk factors for the development of glaucoma in medical history was studied using a questionnaire. Complex inspection included visometry, direct ophthalmoscopy, induction-based tonometry.
Results. Slightly more than half of the students in the age group from 18 to 27 years had emmetro-pia, and every fourth had myopia. The IOP level of22 mm Hg and higher was detected using non-contact tonometry in 6.8% of students, 43.9% of them had risk factors for the development of glaucoma. Students with high myopia had 6 times higher risk of glaucoma development compared to those with mild or mode-rate myopia, hyperopia and emmetropia. No reliab-le data on the increase of IOP when comparing it to groups with various types of ametropia was obtained.
Conclusion. According to the screening results of 835 students, the risk factors for glaucoma and other eye diseases were studied and analyzed, refractive errors were revealed, IOP was evaluated with an Icare tonometer, the relation of IOP with ametropia type, visual acuity and visual acuity with habitual correction was studied.
About the Authors
M. A. Kovalevskaya
Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Med.Sc.D., Professor, Head of the Ophthalmology Department
10 Studencheskaya st., Voronezh, 394036, Russian Federation;
V. V. Myagkov
Academy of Medical Optics and Optometry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Med.Sc.D., Professor, Director
63B, bld. 4 Mikhalkovskaya st., Moscow, 125438, Russian Federation
O. A. Donkareva
Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ph.D., Assistant Professor of the Ophthalmology Department
10 Studencheskaya st., Voronezh, 394036, Russian Federation;
References
1. Saw S.M., Shih-Yen E.C., Koh A., Tan D. Interventions to retard myopia progression in children: an evidence-based update. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:415-421.
2. Vitale S., Sperduto R.D., Ferris F.L. Increased prevalence of myopia in the United States between 1971-1972 and 1999-2004. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:1632-1639.
3. Ding B.Y., Shih Y.F., Lin L.L.K., Hsiao C.K., Wang I.J. Myopia among schoolchildren in East Asia and Singapore. Surv Ophthalmol. 2017;62:677-697.
4. Holden B.A., Fricke T.R., Wilson D.A., Jong M., Naidoo K.S. et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1036-1042.
5. Chen S.J. et al. High myopia as a risk factor in primary open angle glaucoma. Int J Ophthalmol. 2012;5(6):750–753.
6. Kazakova A.V., Eskina E.N. Diagnosis of glaucoma in axial myopia. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2014;12:173. (In Russ.)
7. Strakhov V.V., Gulidova E.G. Features of the progression of myopia depending on the level of ophthalmotonus. Rossiyskaya pediatricheskaya oftal’mologiya. 2011;1:15-19. (In Russ.)
8. Аvetisov S.E., Bubnova I.A., Antonov A.A. The study of the effect of the corneal biomechanical properties on the intraocular pressure measurement. Sibirskii nauchnyi meditsinskii zhurnal. 2009;29(4):30-33. (In Russ.)
9. Kozina E.V. et al. The state of visual acuity and refraction of the eyes of medical students. Sibirskoye meditsinskoye obozreniye. 2015;3:93. (In Russ.)
10. Kondratenko Yu.N., Sergienko N.M., Shutko N.V. Ophthalmotonus and gonioscopic picture in various types of clinical refraction. Oftal’mologicheskiy zhurnal. 1986;8:477. (In Russ.)
11. Pospelov V.I. Etiology, pathogenesis and principles of pathogenetic treatment of the myopia progression in children. In: Modern technologies of drug treatment in ophthalmology: nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya. 2007:1-21. (In Russ.)
12. Kozina E.V., Pospelov V.I. The state of visual acuity and refraction of the eyes of medical students. Sibirskoye me-ditsinskoye obozreniye. 2015;3:93. (In Russ.)
13. Sergienko N.M., Kondratenko Yu.N. Pathogenetic factors of human eye myopization. Mеzhdunarodnii Symposium: Materiali. Moscow; 1990:53–56. (In Russ.)
14. Joseph D.S. et al. A study on association between intraocular pressure and myopia. International J Res Med Sci. 2017;4(6):2202-2205.
15. Volkova N.V., Yurieva T.N., Shvets L.V., Mikhalevich I.M. Correlations and correction factors in different types of tonometry. Report 1. Natsional’nyy zhurnal glaukoma. 2015;14(3):11-18. (In Russ.)
16. International counsil of ophthalmology Guidelines for glaucoma eye care. 2016:28.
17. Pahlitzsch M. et al. Comparison of ICare and IOPen vs Goldmann applanation tonometry according to international standards 8612 in glaucoma patients. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016; 9(11):624.
18. Kovalevskaya M. A., DonkarevaO.V. and others. Funktsiya I struktura v diagnostike I lechenii zabolevaniy setchatki i zritel’nogo nerva. [Function and structure in the diagnosis and treatment of retina and optic nerve diseases.] Voronezh: VSMU; 2016: 218. (In Russ.)
19. Kovalevskaya M.A., Donkareva O.V., Milyutkina S.O., Yaroshevich E.A., Tseplyaeva T.A., Antonyan V.B. Cli-nical and instrumental examination of the risk groups detection for glaucoma screening. In: XI rossiyskiy obshchenatsional’nyy oftal’mologicheskiy forum. Sbor-nik nauchnykh trudov. Moscow; 2018(1):329-331. (In Russ.)
20. Kovalevskaya M.A., Donkareva O.V. Analysis of the co-lor perception dynamics in children with habitually-excessive accommodation strain. Meditsinskiy al’manakh. 2016; 1:41. (In Russ.)
21. Vasudevan B. et al. Under-correction of human myopia – Is it myopigenic?: A retrospective analysis of clinical refraction data. 2013:24.
22. Bakutkin I.V., Spirin V.F., Bakutkin V.V. Experimental and clinical studies of ciliary body electrostimulation. Prakticheskaya meditsina. 2012;4(2):241-244. (In Russ.)
23. Erichev V.P., Filippova O.M. Refractive peculiarities in patients with combined pathology: glaucoma, cataract and myopia. Russkiy meditsinskiy zhurnal. 2003;2:57. (In Russ.)
24. Eremina M.V. The influence of the central cornea thickness on the level of intraocular pressure in normal and pathological conditions. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2006;4:78-83. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kovalevskaya M.A., Myagkov V.V., Donkareva O.A. What makes us meet the needs of a patient with ametropia cautiously? The EYE GLAZ. 2019;21(1 (125)):14-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33791/2222-4408-2019-1-14-24
Views:
752
Email this article 