Preview

The EYE GLAZ

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Long-term outcomes of surgical treatment for persistent full-thickness macular holes

https://doi.org/10.33791/2222-4408-2026-1-37-45

Abstract

Background. In a substantial proportion of patients with full-thickness macular holes, recurrence or persistence of the defect may occur even after technically successful primary surgery. At present, no universally accepted surgical strategy exists for the management of persistent macular holes. Purpose: to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a newly developed combined surgical technique based on internal limiting membrane flap reconstruction for macular holes that failed to close after primary surgery. Materials and methods. The outcomes of the proposed surgical technique were analyzed 3–4 years after reoperation for persistent macular holes. The study included 92 patients aged 66.5 ± 5.5 years who underwent repeat surgery for persistent full-thickness macular holes. Two surgical approaches were evaluated: (1) use of a free internal limiting membrane flap combined with gas-air tamponade and application of autologous conditioned plasma (Group 1, n = 41); (2) use of a free internal limiting membrane flap with silicone oil tamponade (Group 2, n = 51). Optical coherence tomography and microperimetry were the primary assessment methods. Results. Both techniques demonstrated high anatomical success rates and resulted in macular hole closure. However, the technique involving a free internal limiting membrane flap with ACP and gas-air tamponade yielded superior functional outcomes. Patients in this group showed greater improvement in visual acuity (by 0.04; p = 0.003) and retinal sensitivity (by 2.15 dB; p = 0.04) compared with Group 2. These differences are presumably related to the absence of toxic and mechanical effects associated with silicone oil tamponade. Conclusion. The proposed technique using a free internal limiting membrane fl ap combined with gas-air tamponade and autologous conditioned plasma is preferable in terms of functional outcomes, complication minimization, and reduced need for repeat surgical interventions.

About the Authors

R. R. Fayzrakhmanov
Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center
Russian Federation

Rinat R. Fayzrakhmanov, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Ophthalmology Center; Head of the Department of Ophthalmology

70 Nizhnyaya Pervomayskaya St., Moscow, 105203



E. A. Larina
Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center
Russian Federation

Eugeniya A. Larina, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Ophthalmologist, Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology

70 Nizhnyaya Pervomayskaya St., Moscow, 105203



D. A. Romanova
Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center
Russian Federation

Daria A. Romanova, Resident, Department of Ophthalmology

70 Nizhnyaya Pervomayskaya St., Moscow, 105203



References

1. Samoilov AN, Khaibrakhmanov TR, Fazleeva GA, Samoylova PA. Idiopathic macular hole: history and status quo review. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2017;133(6):131–137. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/oftalma20171336131-137

2. Neroyev VV. Eye care management in Russian Federation. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2014;130(6):8–12. (In Russ.)

3. Pavlovskii OA, Larina EA. Closure of large macular tears with preservation of the internal limiting membrane. M odern technologies in ophthalmology. 2019;1:139–144. (In Russ.) doi: 10.25276/2312-4911-2019-1-139-144

4. Bikbov MM, Altanbaev UR, Gilmanshin TR, Chernov MS. Choosing the method of intraoperative closure of idiopathic large-diameter macular rupture. Ophthalmosurgery. 2010;1:25–28. (In Russ.)

5. Baiborodov IV. Anatomical and functional results of the application of various variants of surgical closure of macular tears. M odern technologies in ophthalmology. 2015;1:22–24. (In Russ.)

6. Essex RW, Kingston ZS, Moreno-Betancur M, et al. The Effect of Postoperative Face-Down Positioning and of Longversus Short-Acting Gas in Macular Hole Surgery: Results of a Registry-Based Study [published correction appears in Ophthalmology. 2017;124(6):922–923. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.03.030]. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1129–1136. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.12.039

7. Jackson TL, Donachie PHJ, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL. United Kingdom National Ophthalmology Database study of vitreoretinal surgery: report 2, macular hole. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(3):629–634. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.003

8. Konovalov ME, Kozhuhov AA, Zenina ML, Gorenskii AA. The method of re-closing unclosed macular holes. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2016;1:306–308. (In Russ.)

9. Morizane Y, Shiraga F, Kimura S, Hosokawa M, Shiode Y, Kawata T, Hosogi M, Shirakata Y, Okanouchi T. Autologous transplantation of the internal limiting membrane for refractory macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157(4):861– 869.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.12.028

10. Tereshchenko AV, Triphanenkova IG, Shpak AA, Shilov NM. Forecasting the anatomic result of surgical treatment of large idiopathic macular holes. Рractical medicine. 2017;2(9): 222– 226. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Fayzrakhmanov R.R., Larina E.A., Romanova D.A. Long-term outcomes of surgical treatment for persistent full-thickness macular holes. The EYE GLAZ. 2026;28(1):37-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33791/2222-4408-2026-1-37-45

Views: 225

JATS XML

ISSN 2222-4408 (Print)
ISSN 2686-8083 (Online)