Preview

The EYE GLAZ

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

BOLD fMRI in patients before and after multifocal intraocular lens implantation

https://doi.org/10.33791/2222-4408-2023-4-286-293

Abstract

Background. In practical ophthalmology during cataract surgery, patients are increasingly being implanted with multifocal intraocular lenses (mfIOLs), which form several foci on the retina. The appearing of new factors creates conditions for human neuroadaptation, the parameters of which can be assessed using a modern research method – functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Purpose: to determine the change in the nature of the activation of the visual brain cortex in response to stimulation after surgery for the implantation of a multifocal artifi cial lens. Materials and methods. The study included patients with cataract (n = 22), who underwent structural neuroimaging and BOLD fMRI to assess neuronal activity before and after mfIOL implantation. The Gabor element was used as a stimulus for performing BOLD fMRI (unilluminated and ill uminated versions). fMRI data (positive BOLD effect) were processed using the SPM 12 software package in the Matlab R2017a environment. Evaluation of the research results was carried out at the individual and group levels. Results. When evaluating individual results after mfIOL implantation, patients show more local activation of the cerebral cortex, gravitating towards the area of the spur sulcus, while before surgery, the cortical response is more diffuse. In a group analysis in patients after mfIOL implantation, the total volume of the activation cluster of the cerebral cortex signifi cantly increased by 27 times. Maximum activation is noted in the pulvinar on the right and the lingual gyrus on the left. The activation of the cortex in the study with red illumination of Gabor element after surgery is less than in the study with white illumination, and less than in the study after surgery without illumination of Gabor element. Conclusions. A signifi cant but ambiguous change in the neuronal activity of the cerebral cortex on various stimulation options in patients after mfIOL implantation was established. Further work in this area is planned

About the Authors

A. D. Chuprov
Orenburg branch of the S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution
Russian Federation

Aleksandr D. Chuprov, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Director

17, Salmyshskaya Str., Orenburg, 460047



N. A. Zhediale
“Sozvezdie Oftalmika” Clinic
Russian Federation

Natalia A. Zhediale, Deputy Chief Physician

18, Starykh Proizvodstvennikov Str., Nizhniy Novgorod, 603123



G. V. Tikhomirov
Diagnostic and Treatment Center of the International Institute of Biological Systems named after Sergey Berezin
Russian Federation

Georgii V. Tikhomirov, Neurologist

34, Nesterova Str., Nizhniy Novgorod, 603005



References

1. Chuprov A.D., Zhediale N.A. Subjective assessment of neuroadaptation after implantation of multifocal IOLs. Modern Technologies in Ophtalmology. 2022;4(44):133–138. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25276/2312-4911-2022-4-133-138

2. Fomina O.V., Malyugin B.E., Mushkova I.A. Comparative study of contrast sensitivity function in patients in the long term after intraocular correction of aphakia with multifocal lenses. Modern Technologies in Ophtalmology. 2017;4:186-190. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10/25276/2312-4725-2017-4

3. Schumacher J.F., Thompson S.K., Olman C.A. Contrast response functions for single gabor patches: ROI-based analysis over-represents low-contrast patches for GE BOLD. Front Syst Neurosci. 2011;5:19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2011.00019

4. Kollias S.S. Investigations of the human visual system using functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI). Eur J Radiol. 2004;49(1):64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2003.09.005

5. Morozova S.N., Kremneva E.I., Gadzhieva Z.Sh. et al. Evaluation of fMRI counting task efficiency for normal brain functional connectivity analisys during executive function examination. Medical Visualization. 2020;24(2):119–130. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-2020-2-119-130

6. Amaro E. Jr., Barker G.J. Study design in fMRI: basic principles. Brain Cogn. 2006;60(3):220–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2005.11.009.

7. Cevolani D., Di Donato F., Santarella L. et al. Functional MRI (fMRI) evaluation of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) effi - cacy in chronic cerebral stroke: a small retrospective consecutive case series. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;18(1):190. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010190

8. Tsushima Y., Sawahata Y., Komine K. Task-dependent fMRI decoder with the power to extend Gabor patch results to natural images. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1382. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58241-x

9. Rosa A.M., Miranda Â.C., Patrício M. et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess the neurobehavioral impact of dysphotopsia with multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(9):1280–1289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.03.033

10. Tzourio-Mazoyer N., Landeau B., Papathanassiou D. et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI singlesubject brain. Neuroimage. 2002;15(1):273–289. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0978


Review

For citations:


Chuprov A.D., Zhediale N.A., Tikhomirov G.V. BOLD fMRI in patients before and after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. The EYE GLAZ. 2023;25(4):286-293. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33791/2222-4408-2023-4-286-293

Views: 298


ISSN 2222-4408 (Print)
ISSN 2686-8083 (Online)