<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">glazmag</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">The EYE GLAZ</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>The EYE ГЛАЗ</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2222-4408</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2686-8083</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Академия медицинской оптики и оптометрии</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.33791/2222-4408-2024-4-239-242</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">glazmag-579</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>A chance remark to developments in ortho-k materials</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Роль случайного замечания в понимании преимуществ материалов для ортокератологических линз</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Конвей</surname><given-names>М.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Conway</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Мартин Конвей, консультант по профессиональным Вопросам, член ассоциации британских медицинских оптиков (FBDO), член международной ассоциации преподавателей в области контактных линз (FIACLE), член британской ассоциации контактных линз (FBCLA).</p><p>Карлтон Хаус, Шайя Хилл, Сафрон Волдэн, Эссекс, CB11 3AU</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Martin Conway, Professional Services Manager, Fellow of British Dispensing Opticians (FBDO), Fellow of International Association of Contact Lens Educators (FIACLE), Fellow of British Contact Lens Association (FBCLA).</p><p>Carlton House, Shire Hill, Saffron Walden, Essex CB11 3AU</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Эдлстон</surname><given-names>М.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Eddleston</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Марк Эдлстон, доктор наук Кембриджского университета (Великобритания), ведущий специалист отдела исследований и разработок</p><p>Карлтон Хаус, Шайя Хилл, Сафрон Волдэн, Эссекс, CB11 3AU</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Mark Eddleston, PhD from the University of Cambridge, Project Leader within the R&amp;D Team</p><p>Carlton House, Shire Hill, Saffron Walden, Essex CB11 3AU</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ООО «Контамак»</institution><country>Великобритания</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Contamac Ltd.</institution><country>United Kingdom</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>12</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>239</fpage><lpage>242</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Академия медицинской оптики и оптометрии, 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Академия медицинской оптики и оптометрии</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Академия медицинской оптики и оптометрии</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="https://www.theeyeglaz.com/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>https://www.theeyeglaz.com/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.theeyeglaz.com/jour/article/view/579">https://www.theeyeglaz.com/jour/article/view/579</self-uri><abstract><p>This article evaluates the clinical benefits of using a high Dk material such as Optimum Infinite (180 Dk) material in orthokeratology, demonstrating faster myopia correction due to its higher oxygen permeability, which reduces corneal edema.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В статье оцениваются клинические преимущества использования в ортокератологии материала с высоким значением Dk, таким как Optimum Infinite (180 Dk), демонстрирующим, что высокое значение кислородопроницаемости способствует более быстрой коррекции миопии за счет уменьшения отека роговицы.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Ортокератология</kwd><kwd>орто-К</kwd><kwd>миопия</kwd><kwd>коррекция близорукости</kwd><kwd>кислородопроницаемость</kwd><kwd>материалы для контактных линз</kwd><kwd>разработка материалов</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Orthokeratology</kwd><kwd>ortho-k</kwd><kwd>myopia</kwd><kwd>myopia correction</kwd><kwd>oxygen permeability</kwd><kwd>contact lens materials</kwd><kwd>material developments</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><p>In July 2019, during the Russian Session of the This observation caught our attention, as it suggested a major advantage of the Infinite material. Initially, we questioned whether the improved outcomes were due to the design of the lens or the material itself. Upon returning to the UK, we contacted an independent practitioner in Denmark who exclusively uses the Infinite material for ortho-k patients. He confirmed the same findings, even though he used a different lens design. This reinforced the conclusion that the material, rather than the lens design, was responsible for the accelerated treatment effect.</p><p>After further discussions, we hypothesized that the improvement was not caused by the Infinite material actively molding the cornea, but rather by its ability to reduce factors that typically inhibit treatment. It is well-known that the cornea swells by approximately 4% during sleep due to the reduced availability of oxygen under the closed eyelid [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit1">1</xref>]. This swelling normally resolves after waking as part of the eye’s natural diurnal variation. However, wearing contact lenses can exacerbate this swelling, which inhibits the lens’s ability to mold the cornea effectively. The higher oxygen permeability (Dk) of the Infinite material theoretically reduces corneal edema, allowing treatment to occur more efficiently and achieving the desired refractive change more quickly. This hypothesis is supported by previous orthokeratology studies conducted using lower Dk materials, which found that low oxygen permeability can cause the treatment effect to take longer, or even to prevent it from occurring at all. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit2">2</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit3">3</xref>].</p><p>At this stage, our conclusions were primarily based on anecdotal evidence. To establish a stronger scientific foundation, we collaborated with Professor Michaud, who conducted a controlled study at the University of Montreal.</p><p>For the initial study, 12 participants were recruited from the clinical population at the Clinique Universitaire de la Vision myopia control clinic, Montreal. Inclusion criteria included age 8-15, myopia -3.50D and over, BCVA 6/6 monocular and binocular. (Full details available on file at Contamac Ltd).</p><p>Lenses were manufactured from two different materials. One (L1) was manufactured in a 100 Dk material (Hexafocon A) from a well-known manufacturer, and the second (L2) was made from 180 Dk Optimum Infinite (Tisilfilcon A) material. Both lenses were made to identical centre thicknesses of 0.26 mm. Diameters and curves were personalised using RGP designer software and made to the Montreal OK template (7 curves).</p><p>Normal, full examinations were carried out including slit lamp, topography and aberrometry prior to calculation of the prescription orthokeratology lenses. They were then randomised R&amp;L before being dispensed.</p><p>Refractive changes were measured after 1 night and 3 nights of wear (table 1, 2).</p><table-wrap id="table-1"><caption><p>Table 1. The dynamics of refractive changes following the first night of wearing orthokeratology lenses</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td> </td><td>Initial SE Refraction (D)</td><td>Myopia Corrected (D)</td><td>Residual Refraction (D)</td></tr><tr><td>Optimum Infinite</td><td>–4,68 ± 1,01</td><td>–3,48 ± 1,08</td><td>–0,83 ± 0,91</td></tr><tr><td>100Dk Mat erial</td><td>–4,71 ± 0,94</td><td>–2,81 ± 0,96</td><td>–1,47 ± 0,94</td></tr><tr><td>95% CI</td><td>–0,369/0,308</td><td>–1,02/–0,27</td><td>–1,15/–0,06</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-2"><caption><p>Table 2. The dynamics of refractive changes following the third night of wearing orthokeratology lenses</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td> </td><td>Initial SE Refraction (D)</td><td>Myopia Corrected (D)</td><td>Residual Refraction (D)</td></tr><tr><td>Optimum Infinite</td><td>–4,68 ± 1,01</td><td>–4,14 ± 0,92</td><td>–0,10 ± 0,74</td></tr><tr><td>100Dk Mat erial</td><td>–4,71 ± 0,94</td><td>–3,66 ± 1,07</td><td>–0,67 ± 1,09</td></tr><tr><td>p-value</td><td>0,845</td><td>0,083</td><td>0,021</td></tr><tr><td>95% CI</td><td>–0,369/0,308</td><td>–1,02/–0,27</td><td>–1,15/–0,06</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><sec><title>Results</title><p>In this study, participants with similar prescriptions were fitted with ortho-k lenses of identical design but manufactured from both 100 Dk and 180 Dk materials, with each material used in one eye. After three nights of wear, the participants were evaluated, and a significant difference in treatment effect was observed, with the Optimum Infinite (180 Dk) material producing greater overall change. While this study involved a small group, the results provided compelling evidence supporting the superior performance of the Optimum Infinite material in ortho-k lenses.</p><p>Taking further this observation that the degree of overnight edema affects the rate at which myopia correction occurs during ortho-k, it would be expected that reducing lens thickness would also speed up the treatment effect. Importantly, however, reducing lens thickness will also have the undesirable effect of increasing lens flexure, which may itself slow or reduce the effectiveness of ortho-k treatment. For each material/lens design combination there will be an optimal lens thickness where adaptation time is minimised (Figure 1).</p><fig id="fig-1"><caption><p>Fig 1. Hypothetical graph showing how ortho-k adaptation time may vary with lens thickness</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="glazmag-26-4-g001.jpeg"><uri content-type="original_file">https://cdn.elpub.ru/assets/journals/glazmag/2024/4/1am7bvAFGYVo1DZTF1RimYBGN5UEy3SYuHMtbb6Y.jpeg</uri></graphic></fig><p>Finally, we considered whether further improvements could be made by developing materials with even higher Dk values. At Contamac, we are able to produce materials with Dk values of 250 or even 300. However, we still needed to determine whether these increases would provide clinically significant benefits, or whether we would reach a point of diminishing returns, where factors such as wettability, manufacturing challenges, and cost would outweigh any marginal advantages.</p><p>A subsequent study, also conducted at the University of Montreal, was initiated to evaluate whether there were any significant benefits in using a material of higher Dk than the currently available Optimum Infinite (180 Dk).</p><p>In this study, conventional lenses were designed both with different materials (Optimum Infinite, 180 Dk and an experimental 250 Dk material) and different thicknesses (0.20 and 0.26 mm). This produced 4 lens types with Dk/t values of 69 (180/0.26), 125 (250/0.20), 96 (250/0.26, and 90 (180/0.20). All lens diameters were standardised at 9.8 mm and base curves calculated at 0.1 mm flatter than flattest central corneal curvature as is standard for normal GP lens fitting.</p><p>20 participants were recruited from the student population at the university and randomly selected into 2 groups to wear lenses under patched eye conditions for 3 hours. In group one lenses had a thickness of 0.26 mm, whereas in group two lenses had a thickness of 0.20 mm. Lens material was assigned at random.</p><p>Patches were removed and eyes were then evaluated for keratometry, pachymetry, and densitometry variations from baseline readings with minimum delay.</p><p>After 3 days, the experiment was repeated using the other material (same lens thickness).</p><p>It has previously been shown (Harvitt and Bonanno) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="cit4">4</xref>] that the minimum Dk/t threshold to avoid hypoxia increases from 35 for daily wear to 125 under closed eye conditions, so it was anticipated that some degree of hypoxia related eye changes would occur during closed-eye lens wear with three of the four investigated lenses.</p><p>In practice, however, no statistically significant differences were observed in measurements taken from participants after they wore a 180 Dk lens compared to when they wore a 250 Dk lens or no lens at all, either with the 0.20 mm lenses or the 0.26 mm lenses. This gives an indication that the clinical advantages of moving from a 180 Dk material to a 250 Dk material would be small, although differences could have been masked by the variability associated with the measurement techniques and with individual responses to hypoxia, combined with the relatively small number of participants in the study.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Achieving target refractive outcomes over a weekend rather than over the course of a week, was enabled by switching from a 100 Dk material to Optimum</p><p>Infinite (180 Dk). This offers clear benefits for patient convenience, particularly for adults who need to return to work or other daily activities. More importantly, increasing oxygen availability to the cornea through higher Dk materials represents a healthier option for both children and adults undergoing ortho-k treatment.</p><p>This clinical journey, which started with a casual remark in Izhevsk, has led us to important advancements in the understanding and development of ortho-k lens materials.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">du Toit R, Vega JA, Fonn D, Simpson T. Diurnal variation of corneal sensitivity and thickness. Cornea. 2003;22(3):205–299. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200304000-00004</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">du Toit R, Vega JA, Fonn D, Simpson T. Diurnal variation of corneal sensitivity and thickness. Cornea. 2003;22(3):205–299. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200304000-00004</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lum E, Swarbrick HA. Lens Dk/t influences the clinical response in overnight orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88(4):469–475. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31820bb0db</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lum E, Swarbrick HA. Lens Dk/t influences the clinical response in overnight orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88(4):469–475. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31820bb0db</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Swarbrick HA, Jayakumar J, Co W, et al. Overnight corneal edema can modulate the short-term clinical response to orthokeratology lens wear. https://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2401535. (Accessed: 10.10.2024).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Swarbrick HA, Jayakumar J, Co W, et al. Overnight corneal edema can modulate the short-term clinical response to orthokeratology lens wear. https://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2401535. (Accessed: 10.10.2024).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Harvitt DM, Bonanno JA. Re-evaluation of the oxygen diffusion model for predicting minimum contact lens Dk/t values needed to avoid corneal anoxia. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76(10):712–719. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199910000-00023</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harvitt DM, Bonanno JA. Re-evaluation of the oxygen diffusion model for predicting minimum contact lens Dk/t values needed to avoid corneal anoxia. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76(10):712–719. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199910000-00023</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
