<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">glazmag</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">The EYE ГЛАЗ</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The EYE GLAZ</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2222-4408</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2686-8083</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Академия медицинской оптики и оптометрии</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.33791/2222-4408-2026-3-200-210</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">glazmag-869</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Влияние типа кераторефракционной операции на интерпретацию уровня внутриглазного давления: роль топографо-биомеханического ремоделирования роговицы</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Impact of keratorefractive surgery type on the interpretation of intraocular pressure measurements: the role of corneal topographic and biomechanical remodeling</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5171-8261</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Антонов</surname><given-names>А. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Antonov</surname><given-names>A. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Антонов Алексей Анатольевич, доктор медицинских наук, заведующий отделом глаукомы</p><p>119021, г. Москва, ул. Россолимо, д. 11А, Б</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Alexey A. Antonov, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Glaucoma Department</p><p>11A, B, Rossolimo St., Moscow, 119021</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9744-0149</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Клиничева</surname><given-names>Е. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Klinicheva</surname><given-names>E. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Клиничева Елизавета Андреевна, аспирант, врач-офтальмолог</p><p>119021, г. Москва, ул. Россолимо, д. 11А, Б; 141009, Московская обл., г. Мытищи, Олимпийский проспект, д. 5</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Elizaveta A. Klinicheva, Postgraduate Student; Ophthalmologist</p><p>11A, B, Rossolimo St., Moscow, 119021; 5, Olimpiysky Ave., Mytishchi, Moscow Region, 141009</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1421-8882</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Волжанин</surname><given-names>А. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Volzhanin</surname><given-names>A. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Волжанин Андрей Вячеславович, кандидат медицинских наук, научный сотрудник отдела глаукомы</p><p>119021, г. Москва, ул. Россолимо, д. 11А, Б</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Andrey V. Volzhanin, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Researcher, Glaucoma Department</p><p>11A, B, Rossolimo St., Moscow, 119021</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">avolzhanin@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9193-0582</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Акимов</surname><given-names>А. М.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Akimov</surname><given-names>A. M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Акимов Артемий Михайлович, младший научный сотрудник отдела глаукомы</p><p>119021, г. Москва, ул. Россолимо, д. 11А, Б</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Artemiy M. Akimov, Junior Researcher, Glaucoma Department</p><p>11A, B, Rossolimo St., Moscow, 119021</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ФГБНУ «НИИ глазных болезней им. М.М. Краснова»</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>M.M. Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ФГБНУ «НИИ глазных болезней им. М.М. Краснова»;  ООО «Центр микрохирургии глаза “Консилиум”»</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>M.M. Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases; Consilium Eye Microsurgery Center LLC</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>09</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>200</fpage><lpage>210</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Академия медицинской оптики и оптометрии, 2026</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Академия медицинской оптики и оптометрии</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Академия медицинской оптики и оптометрии</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="https://www.theeyeglaz.com/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>https://www.theeyeglaz.com/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.theeyeglaz.com/jour/article/view/869">https://www.theeyeglaz.com/jour/article/view/869</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Актуальность</title><p>Актуальность. Кераторефракционная хирургия широко применяется для коррекции миопии, однако изменение конфигурации роговицы неизбежно влияет на ее биомеханические свойства. Это снижает точность измерения внутриглазного давления в диагностике глаукомы у оперированных пациентов и оценку риска развития ятрогенной эктазии роговицы.</p></sec><sec><title>Цель</title><p>Цель: оценить влияние корреляционных связей между топографическими и биомеханическими параметрами роговицы на измерение офтальмотонуса в зависимости от метода выполненной кераторефракционной операции.</p></sec><sec><title>Материалы и методы</title><p>Материалы и методы. Обследован 61 пациент (121 глаз) в возрасте от 21 года до 60 лет. Контрольную группу составили 16 человек (31 глаз) без оперативных вмешательств. Основная группа включала 45 пациентов (90 глаз): после лазерного кератомилеза in situ – 26 глаз, после фемтосекундного лазерного кератомилеза – 32 глаза, после фоторефракционной кератэктомии – 32 глаза. Проведены кератотопография (Pentacam), измерение биомеханических параметров роговицы на Ocular Response Analyzer (корнеальный гистерезис, фактор резистентности роговицы), а также эластотонометрия.</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты</title><p>Результаты. После лазерного кератомилеза и фемтосекундного лазерного кератомилеза отмечено занижение показателей внутриглазного давления: роговично-компенсированное давление оказалось на 1,69–2,62 мм рт. ст. ниже, а давление, приравненное к тонометрии по Гольдману, – на 3,23–4,18 мм рт. ст. ниже по сравнению с контрольной группой. После фоторефракционной кератэктомии значения роговично-компенсированного давления и внутриглазного давления, приведенного к тонометрии по Гольдману, были сопоставимы с контролем. Для операций с формированием роговичного лоскута были характерны преимущественно обратные корреляции между биомеханическими показателями и кривизной роговицы, максимальные для фактора резистентности роговицы и корнеального гистерезиса в центральной и ближней парацентральных зонах (|r| до 0,6; p &lt; 0,01). После фоторефракционной кератэктомии и в интактных роговицах преобладали прямые корреляции этих показателей с кривизной роговицы.</p></sec><sec><title>Заключение</title><p>Заключение. Различные методы кераторефракционной хирургии оказывают дифференцированное влияние на биомеханическое ремоделирование роговицы, что необходимо учитывать при интерпретации результатов тонометрии и оценке развития ятрогенных осложнений.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Background</title><p>Background. Keratorefractive surgery is widely used to correct myopia; however, surgery-induced changes in corneal shape inevitably affect corneal biomechanical properties. These changes reduce the accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements used in glaucoma assessment and complicate the evaluation of the risk of iatrogenic corneal ectasia in patients who have undergone surgery.</p></sec><sec><title>Purpose</title><p>Purpose: to evaluate how the relationships between corneal topographic and biomechanical parameters vary according to the type of keratorefractive surgery and to determine their implications for the interpretation of intraocular pressure measurements.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and methods</title><p>Materials and methods. A total of 61 participants (121 eyes) aged 21–60 years were examined. The control group included 16 participants (31 eyes) with no history of ocular surgery. The study group included 45 patients (90 eyes) who had undergone LASIK (26 eyes), femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK; 32 eyes), or photorefractive keratectomy (32 eyes). The examination included corneal topography using the Pentacam, assessment of corneal biomechanical parameters using the Ocular Response Analyzer, including corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor, and elastotonometry.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. Following LASIK and FS-LASIK, IOP measurements were underestimated: corneal-compensated intraocular pressure was 1.69–2.62 mm Hg lower and Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure was 3.23–4.18 mm Hg lower than in the control group. After photorefractive keratectomy, corneal-compensated intraocular pressure and Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure values were comparable to those in the control group. Procedures involving corneal flap creation were characterized predominantly by inverse correlations between corneal biomechanical parameters and corneal curvature. The strongest correlations were observed for corneal resistance factor and corneal hysteresis in the central and inner paracentral zones (|r| up to 0.6; p &lt; 0.01). After photorefractive keratectomy and in intact corneas, direct correlations between these parameters and corneal curvature predominated.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Conclusion. Different keratorefractive surgery techniques affect corneal biomechanical remodeling differently. These effects should be considered when interpreting tonometry results and assessing the risk of iatrogenic complications.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>биомеханика роговицы</kwd><kwd>кератометрия</kwd><kwd>топография</kwd><kwd>Ocular Response Analyzer</kwd><kwd>кераторефракционная хирургия</kwd><kwd>внутриглазное давление</kwd><kwd>тонометрия</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>corneal biomechanics</kwd><kwd>keratometry</kwd><kwd>corneal topography</kwd><kwd>Ocular Response Analyzer</kwd><kwd>keratorefractive surgery</kwd><kwd>intra-ocular pressure</kwd><kwd>tonometry</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Авторы не получали финансирование при проведении исследования и написании статьи</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The authors received no specific funding for this work</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hopf S, Schuster A. Epidemiology of Myopia: Prevalence, Risk Factors and Effects of Myopia. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2024;241(10):1119–1125. doi: 10.1055/a-2340-1790</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hopf S, Schuster A. Epidemiology of Myopia: Prevalence, Risk Factors and Effects of Myopia. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2024;241(10):1119–1125. doi: 10.1055/a-2340-1790</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Morgan IG. Is there an impending epidemic of myopia in Southeast Asia? An appraisal of the evidence. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2024;13(6):100113. doi: 10.1016/j.apjo.2024.100113</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Morgan IG. Is there an impending epidemic of myopia in Southeast Asia? An appraisal of the evidence. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2024;13(6):100113. doi: 10.1016/j.apjo.2024.100113</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M et al. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M et al. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kim TI, Alió Del Barrio JL, Wilkins M, Cochener B, Ang M. Refractive surgery. Lancet. 2019;393(10185):2085–2098. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33209-4</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kim TI, Alió Del Barrio JL, Wilkins M, Cochener B, Ang M. Refractive surgery. Lancet. 2019;393(10185):2085–2098. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33209-4</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bao F, Lopes BT, Zheng X, Ji Y, Wang J, Elsheikh A. Corneal Biomechanics Losses Caused by Refractive Surgery. Curr Eye Res. 2023;48(2):137–143. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2022.2103569</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bao F, Lopes BT, Zheng X, Ji Y, Wang J, Elsheikh A. Corneal Biomechanics Losses Caused by Refractive Surgery. Curr Eye Res. 2023;48(2):137–143. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2022.2103569</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">European Glaucoma Society Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 5&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; Edition. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021;105(Suppl 1):1–169. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-egsguidelines</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">European Glaucoma Society Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 5&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; Edition. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021;105(Suppl 1):1–169. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-egsguidelines</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Moshirfar M, Tukan AN, Bundogji N, Liu HY, McCabe SE, Ronquillo YC, Hoopes PC. Ectasia After Corneal Refractive Surgery : A Systematic Review. Ophthalmol Ther 2021;10(4):753–776. doi: 10.1007/s40123-021-00383-w</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Moshirfar M, Tukan AN, Bundogji N, Liu HY, McCabe SE, Ronquillo YC, Hoopes PC. Ectasia After Corneal Refractive Surgery : A Systematic Review. Ophthalmol Ther 2021;10(4):753–776. doi: 10.1007/s40123-021-00383-w</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Антонов АА, Козлова ИВ. Коэффициент биомеханического напряжения в оценке степени компенсации внутриглазного давления. Вестник офтальмологии. 2021;5(2):255–261. doi: 10.17116/oftalma2021137052255</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Антонов АА, Козлова ИВ. Коэффициент биомеханического напряжения в оценке степени компенсации внутриглазного давления. Вестник офтальмологии. 2021;5(2):255–261. doi: 10.17116/oftalma2021137052255</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Antonov AA, Kozlova IV. Coefficient of biomechanical stress in assessment of the degree of intraocular pressure compensation. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2021;137(5-2):255–261. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/oftalma2021137052255</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Antonov AA, Kozlova IV. Coefficient of biomechanical stress in assessment of the degree of intraocular pressure compensation. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2021;137(5-2):255–261. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/oftalma2021137052255</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Knorz MC, Vossmerbaeumer U. Comparison of flap adhesion strength using the Amadeus microkeratome and the IntraLase iFS femtosecond laser in rabbits. J Refract Surg. 2008;24(9):875-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20081101-04</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Knorz MC, Vossmerbaeumer U. Comparison of flap adhesion strength using the Amadeus microkeratome and the IntraLase iFS femtosecond laser in rabbits. J Refract Surg. 2008;24(9):875-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20081101-04</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kim JY, Kim MJ, Kim TI, Choi HJ, Pak JH, Tchah H. A femtosecond laser creates a stronger flap than a mechanical microkeratome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(2):599-604. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0458</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kim JY, Kim MJ, Kim TI, Choi HJ, Pak JH, Tchah H. A femtosecond laser creates a stronger flap than a mechanical microkeratome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(2):599-604. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0458</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Ohmoto F. Comparison of the changes in corneal biomechanical properties after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea. 2009;28(7):765-769. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181967082</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Ohmoto F. Comparison of the changes in corneal biomechanical properties after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea. 2009;28(7):765-769. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181967082</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hamilton DR, Johnson RD, Lee N, Bourla N. Differences in the corneal biomechanical effects of surface ablation compared with laser in situ keratomileusis using a microkeratome or femtosecond laser. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(12):2049–2056. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.08.021</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hamilton DR, Johnson RD, Lee N, Bourla N. Differences in the corneal biomechanical effects of surface ablation compared with laser in situ keratomileusis using a microkeratome or femtosecond laser. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(12):2049–2056. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.08.021</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hashemi H, Roberts CJ, Elsheikh A, Mehravaran S, Panahi P, Asgari S. Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE, Femtosecond-Assisted LASIK, and Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Matched Comparison Study. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023;12(3):12. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.3.12</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hashemi H, Roberts CJ, Elsheikh A, Mehravaran S, Panahi P, Asgari S. Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE, Femtosecond-Assisted LASIK, and Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Matched Comparison Study. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023;12(3):12. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.3.12</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pniakowska Z, Jurowski P, Wierzbowska J. Clinical Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanics following Laser Refractive Surgery in Myopic Eyes : A Review of the Literature. J Clin Med. 2022;12(1):243. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010243</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pniakowska Z, Jurowski P, Wierzbowska J. Clinical Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanics following Laser Refractive Surgery in Myopic Eyes : A Review of the Literature. J Clin Med. 2022;12(1):243. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010243</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Damgaard IB, Reffat M, Hjortdal J. Review of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Following LASIK and SMILE for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism. Open Ophthalmol J. 2018;12:164–174. doi: 10.2174/1874364101812010164</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Damgaard IB, Reffat M, Hjortdal J. Review of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Following LASIK and SMILE for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism. Open Ophthalmol J. 2018;12:164–174. doi: 10.2174/1874364101812010164</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Guo H, Hosseini-Moghaddam SM, Hodge W. Corneal biomechanical properties after SMILE versus FLEX, LASIK, LASEK, or PRK : a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1165-3</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Guo H, Hosseini-Moghaddam SM, Hodge W. Corneal biomechanical properties after SMILE versus FLEX, LASIK, LASEK, or PRK : a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1165-3</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
